SSolarc Labs
InvoiceBatch FR/Synthetic example · not customer evidence

Downloadable evidence-pack walkthrough

Inspect the shape of the handoff before you share a corpus.

These files use a fictional implementation scenario to show the evidence structure. They are not a customer case study, certification, PA acceptance result, production run or measured outcome.

Fictional scenario only

The downloadable pack models three synthetic structured invoices with an illustrative mapping gap, profile review item and re-test state. Every sample labels itself synthetic so it cannot be confused with customer evidence.

manifest.json

Input identifiers, release/rule provenance and the bounded claim boundary.

Download sample

findings.csv

Normalised findings for filtering by source, rule, severity and business term.

Download sample

coverage.csv

Observed term coverage in the fictional corpus; never converted into a fake compliance score.

Download sample

mapping-gaps.csv

Fictional source-to-business-term mapping gaps/conflicts.

Download sample

review.json

Explicit review/remediation state for findings that require a human decision.

Download sample

sources.json

Public source provenance used to illustrate the evidence shape.

Download sample

What a re-test is meant to preserve

The starting state should remain visible. A bounded re-test compares resolved, new and unchanged findings instead of replacing the first report with a cleaner-looking second one.

Resolved

A fictional mapping issue no longer appears after the example correction.

Unchanged

A fictional profile review item remains visible.

New

A newly introduced finding would remain visible rather than hidden by the remediation narrative.

If the evidence shape fits the gap

Use the smallest paid corpus scope.

€490 covers one source / up to 100 representative invoices. The €1,500 integrator scope covers up to three sources / 300 invoices total with consolidated comparison and two bounded re-tests.