manifest.json
Input identifiers, release/rule provenance and the bounded claim boundary.
Download sampleDownloadable evidence-pack walkthrough
These files use a fictional implementation scenario to show the evidence structure. They are not a customer case study, certification, PA acceptance result, production run or measured outcome.
The downloadable pack models three synthetic structured invoices with an illustrative mapping gap, profile review item and re-test state. Every sample labels itself synthetic so it cannot be confused with customer evidence.
Input identifiers, release/rule provenance and the bounded claim boundary.
Download sampleNormalised findings for filtering by source, rule, severity and business term.
Download sampleObserved term coverage in the fictional corpus; never converted into a fake compliance score.
Download sampleFictional source-to-business-term mapping gaps/conflicts.
Download sampleExplicit review/remediation state for findings that require a human decision.
Download samplePublic source provenance used to illustrate the evidence shape.
Download sampleThe starting state should remain visible. A bounded re-test compares resolved, new and unchanged findings instead of replacing the first report with a cleaner-looking second one.
Resolved
A fictional mapping issue no longer appears after the example correction.
Unchanged
A fictional profile review item remains visible.
New
A newly introduced finding would remain visible rather than hidden by the remediation narrative.
If the evidence shape fits the gap
€490 covers one source / up to 100 representative invoices. The €1,500 integrator scope covers up to three sources / 300 invoices total with consolidated comparison and two bounded re-tests.